The use of data of deceased peoples and the right to posthumous memory

  • Andrea Cristina Stacey-Freire Universidad Regional Autónoma de los Andes, Ambato, Tungurahua, Ecuador
  • Gladis Margot Proaño-Reyes Universidad Regional Autónoma de los Andes, Ambato, Tungurahua, Ecuador
  • Fernando de Jesús Castro-Sánchez Universidad Regional Autónoma de los Andes, Ambato, Tungurahua, Ecuador
Keywords: Posthumous memory, data protection, human rights, privacy, ethics, (UNESCO Thesaurus).

Abstract

This article analyzes the use of personal data belonging to deceased individuals and its link to the right to posthumous memory, understood as respect and dignity in the preservation of digital legacies. In a context where information transcends life, the absence of clear regulations poses ethical and legal challenges. Using a qualitative approach, current legislation and doctrine are examined to determine whether the misuse of this data violates that right, affecting both the deceased and their relatives. The findings highlight the need for a robust legal framework that not only protects the data of living persons but also extends that protection beyond death. It is concluded that guaranteeing posthumous memory requires consistent regulations that ensure dignity and respect in the processing of post-mortem data, thereby strengthening digital ethics and justice in the management of personal legacies.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Andrea Cristina Stacey-Freire, Universidad Regional Autónoma de los Andes, Ambato, Tungurahua, Ecuador
Gladis Margot Proaño-Reyes, Universidad Regional Autónoma de los Andes, Ambato, Tungurahua, Ecuador
Fernando de Jesús Castro-Sánchez, Universidad Regional Autónoma de los Andes, Ambato, Tungurahua, Ecuador

References

Ashley, K. C. (2020). Data of the dead: A proposal for protecting posthumous data privacy. William & Mary Law Review, 62(2), 649. https://bit.ly/3C4kZ82

Baumgartner, L. (2024). Schadenersatz bei postmortaler Persönlichkeitsverletzung. Johannes Kepler Universität. https://bit.ly/3BTP2H9

Bundesverfassungsgericht. (2022). Verfassungsbeschwerden betreffend das postmortale Persönlichkeitsrecht. https://n9.cl/tzvj0

Commission nationale de l’informatique et des libertés (CNIL). (2016). Mort numérique: effacement des informations d’une personne décédée. https://bit.ly/3ykkG5y

Constitución de la República del Ecuador. (2008). Constitución de la República del Ecuador. (Reforma vigente). Registro Oficial. https://bit.ly/4gDaZuA

Esteve, M. E. (2021). Protección de Datos Personales y garantía de los derechos digitales. https://n9.cl/tlzm

European Union. (2016). Regulation (EU) 2016/679. (General Data Protection Regulation). Official Journal of the European Union. https://bit.ly/3SkXw4r

Fernández de Marcos, I. D. (2019). Diccionario de protección de datos personales. Instituto Nacional de Transparencia, Acceso a la Información y Protección de Datos Personales. https://bit.ly/3Slt4eM

Haneman, V. (2025). The law of digital resurrection. Boston College Law Review. https://bit.ly/4g7MgzS

Iure Novum. (2025). Datos Personales Fallecidos Ecuador y Herencia Digital. https://n9.cl/r1o7r

Kiteworks. (s.f.). Introducción a la Ley Japonesa de Protección de Datos. https://n9.cl/kxt2tn

Mayer-Schönberger, V. (2009). Delete: The virtue of forgetting in the digital age. Princeton University Press. https://bit.ly/3U39zLJ

Mephisto. (1971). Caso del Tribunal Constitucional Federal de Alemania. 30 BVerfGE 173 https://bit.ly/3C5XvYF

Ley Orgánica de Protección de Datos Personales. (2021). Registro Oficial del Ecuador. https://bit.ly/3BJ0LnW

UNESCO/PERSIST. (2021). Guidelines for the Selection of Digital Heritage for Long-Term Preservation. IFLA/UNESCO. https://bit.ly/3Sg9O4N

UNESCO. (2023). Guidelines for the Governance of Digital Platforms. https://bit.ly/4gE9fP2
Published
2025-08-01

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 > >>